nate

This commentary strikes a great balance between readability, thoughtful interpretation, and technical precision. It is much more approachable than most technical commentaries such as AB, WBC, ICC, Herm., or even NICNT. However, it contains much of the important information found in the technical commentaries (sometimes more). This information is often relegated to the footnotes so that the body of the text can focus on interpretation. As a PhD student studying John, I suggest that this commentary will be helpful for people from the interested lay person to Johannine scholars.