Daniel Ligon

While there is much to learn from Murphy's analysis of Ecclesiastes, I disagree with most of his major conclusions.

Longman's book is thorough and can be helpful in certain specifics, but I have major disagreements with Longman's overall pessimistic interpretation of Ecclesiastes. While I might consult this book for a confusing verse or passage, I wouldn't use it to shape my overall direction.

While dated and more textual (less big picture)than I would prefer, I still greatly appreciate Bridges' optimistic view of the book, his obviously deep spirituality, and his high view of Scripture.

The section on Ecclesiastes is excellent and thorough, without being overly technical.