Andrzej Stelmasiak

true classic. typical Puritan, goldmine for preaching and attention to the detail. Great antidote for that modern 'sex manual/love poem' approach.

This commentary is REALLY good. Carson is 7 out of 10 for me, Kostenberger, Morris and Ridderbos are all 8 out of 10 but this one (if everything is as good as what I have read up to now) I will rate as 9.5 out of 10. It is only Beasley-Murray that was referencing Aquinas in his commentary and it was only once, the rest of the commentators strangely ignore him, this one will interact with Aquinas often, same as with John Chrysostom and Augustine, he will reference people from all across the ages. His methodology is really good and I do appreciate his approach to John 7:53-8:11. RECOMMENDED!

It is technical but really good read - what is typical to Morris, his writings are always readable even when technical in their nature. He presents good understanding of Hebrews 6 (true Christian cannot commit apostasy), and - good understanding of the theme of Hebrews overall. I would encourage you to read everything that man has written, edifying and soul nourishing in the same time.

Very good commentary, doesn't waste too much time on discussing odd ideas, goes straight to the point. I wouldn't mark him above Charles Hodge's or John Murray's commentaries but it is good and solid - I agree with everything Stephen Hess said below.

BEWARE!!! not evangelical, according to Goldingay God is not omniscient neither in control, he changes his mind, the Bible is not inerrant, it is inspired only...

THE BEST ST AVAILABLE!!! Do not be afraid - if English is my second language and I love it, if my wife does not have a theological education and she can sit and read him - it means, it is well written, very clear, deep, but really beneficial. Very well argued what is the meaning of "Israel" in the NT

THE BEST ST AVAILABLE!!! Do not be afraid - if English is my second language and I love it, if my wife does not have a theological education and she can sit and read him - it means, it is well written, very clear, deep, but really beneficial.

THE BEST S AVAILABLE!!! Do not be afraid - if English is my second language and I love it, if my wife does not have a theological education and she can sit and read him - it means, it is well written, very clear, deep, but really beneficial.

THE BEST S AVAILABLE!!! Do not be afraid - if English is my second language and I love it, if my wife does not have a theological education and can sit and read him - it means, it is well written, very clear, deep, but really beneficial.

Grudem is a continuationalist, but other than that - it's OK. It's not Bavinck but it's good enough to be a stand alone ST in many homes. Very clear style of writing.

Classic work, I do not agree with Carl Trueman who calls Berkhof "boring". Good, succint systematic theology from the paedobaptist camp.

Interesting, not as a major book on Job but mind stretching addition.

Expanded version of his chapter from Biblical Theology, great read, very beneficial. Everything Beale writes is a must read.

Classic book on BT, not really a bed time book like Goldsworthy can be but still - it is a must read.

1st class.

GREAT! I agree with Sam Storms that it is even better than Gene Green's commentary in the Pillar series.

This book will be the standard BT for the next few decades if the Lord will not come back before. Wonderful, true masterpiece, maybe even more profitable than his commentary on Revelation.

Clowney at his best, must read!

I do not agree with his thesis that Christian can apostate (Hebrews) but other than that - it's great.

Goldsworthy's classic books Gospel & Kingdom, Gospel & Witness and The Gospel in Revelation in one volume, great read.

Terrific, very well argued thesis that OT believers were regenerated by the Holy Spirit but not indwelt by Him as God dwelt in the temple. Very good counterbalance to Sinclair Ferguson's and John Owen's arguments.

VERY, but VERY GOOD! OK, it is not as thorough nor technical as Block or Allen are, but I really like it, it's simple and goes straight to the point. Apart from the exposition he will offer some theological implications as well, and most importantly, it is Christocentric. His introduction is also very helpful itself. He was a reformed baptist with a very good understanding of how covenants work. Fully recommended! Somebody have said that it's especially good to combine it with Duguid's commentary, I second that.

Very good explanation of the text, although not entirely Christocentric - you'll have to do it for yourself, Andrew Stewart or Christopher Wright are better on this aspect.

Some thoughts here are outstanding, but there are some better "stand-alone" commentaries on this book, like Sidney Greidanus, Dale Ralph Davis or Sinclair Ferguson

Helpful tips for preaching, solid.

6 stars out of 5, this one is absolutely best commentary on the Song of Solomon! Not bothered about that Tremper Longman style of interpretation, but not allegorical either - beautifully Christocentric!!!

Christocentric!!!

Helpful tips for preaching

Helpful tips for preaching. It looks like FF Bruce's commentary is being preached, good applications as well, but sometimes I wish he would be more focused on preaching Christ and His gospel.

Helpful tips for preaching

Not as thorough as his books on the Pentateuch but that's more to the Welwyn Commentaries restrictions. Still - very, very good! Get this one, Dale Ralph Davis and Martin Woudstra to have it beautifully covered.

Very good!

Brilliant, very accesible, half way between Hodge and Stott in terms depth/jargon. Theologically sound - especially Romans 7 and 9, not to mention well explained 11.

Very good!!! Maintains literal (6 x 24hrs) creation account

Similarly to Wenham, Waltke as an theistic evolutionist does not hold to literal view of Genesis 1

Contrary to what Derek Thomas have written, Wenham does not maintain literary view of Genesis 1 - he is a theistic evolutionist.

Ross is a dispensationlist, not everybody's conviction

good, solid commentary! Currid is one of the most readable commentators on the books of the pentateuch

Easier to read than Beale's grand work, still very good.

Read together with William Hendriksen's one, both are easy to read, grest amillenial commentaries.

Read together with Michael Wilcock's one, both easy to read, grest amillenial commentaries.

A classic.

Good pastoral commentary, compliments Stott's quite well.