I and II Kings
I and II Kings

I and II Kings

in Old Testament Library

by Marvin A. Sweeney

4.16 Rank Score: 4.84 from 5 reviews, 3 featured collections, and 6 user libraries
Pages 476
Publisher Westminster John Knox
Published 1/1/2007
ISBN-13 9780664220846


This book appears in the following featured collections.


Add Your Review

Sweeney’s commentary is not only aware of the scholarly debates surrounding the book of Kings, he navigates them with ease. He helps us to understand the discussions in the academy and provides compelling arguments and syntheses of his own. Useful for scholars and teachers, but not a preaching commentary. [Full Review]
G Ware G Ware November 15, 2018
A balanced approach, but a bit too scant on detail, given that the OTL is a more advanced, in depth series.
Literary Sparks Literary Sparks December 26, 2017
Just finished reading this, because I was studying Saul. I appreciated the Hebrew details that I couldn't get in other commentaries.
Philibuster Philibuster July 5, 2012
Sweeney has several helpful insights into Kings. He is at his best when dealing with the literary aspects of the text. As a caveat, much of his interpretation is based on his historical reconstruction of different redactions of the text; if you don't agree with him here, this will be less useful for you. If nothing else, read the intro. It's excellent.
Assume you have to teach an undergraduate course on Kings, and you are supposed to cover both the literary and the historical aspects; which three commentaries would you advise your students to consult? There are still Würthwein and Cogan-Tadmor, but for the third? The two Berit Olam volumes are excellent but do not serve your present purpose; V. Fritz is too short, Mulder too thick, incomplete, and historically aberrant. Could the new commentary by Marvin Sweeney fill the gap? With a little less than five hundred pages for all of Kings, the format is just about right, as is the length and depth of the introduction (ca. 10 percent of the text). But then the objections start to amass. Both in its positions and in its selection of references, the commentary is very much a thing past biblical scholarship, hardly addresses the present debates, and cannot expect too much of a future. Kings tells the history of the Israelite and Judean monarchies more or less correctly (including Josiah’s impossible cultic centralization), if from a specific ideological point of view, and the text was finalized during the exile. Concerning Naboth’s vineyard (1 Kgs 21), the reader is referred to the recent excavations (247 n. 66) but without being told that the Omride military camp found by Ussishkin and Woodhead cannot possibly serve as the venue for the plot of 1 Kgs 21 (no room for vineyards there). [Full Review]