Ecclesiastes
Ecclesiastes
Non-technical

Ecclesiastes

in Interpretation

by William P. Brown

4.33 Rank Score: 4.69 from 3 reviews, 1 featured collections, and 2 user libraries
Pages 143
Publisher Westminster John Knox
Published 1/1/2000
ISBN-13 9780804231466

Collections

This book appears in the following featured collections.

Reviews

Add Your Review

DavidH DavidH April 20, 2026
Brown's Ecclesiastes (Interpretation, 2000) is elegantly written and pastorally imaginative, with real strengths in its treatment of joy, work, and the carpe diem passages. Several concerns, however, warrant caution. He uses the Gilgamesh Epic as his primary interpretive lens throughout, well beyond what the evidence supports; Krüger (Hermeneia) calls broader dependence claims "pure hypothetical speculation," and Seow (AB) treats the parallels as shared cultural themes, not literary dependence. His heading "Cosmos without Creation" (on 1:3–7), arguing that God "does not appear to be involved," is exegetically extreme and inconsistent with his own later affirmations that God gives every good gift and receives the life-breath back (12:7); Seow, Bartholomew (BCOT), and Longman (NICOT) more accurately read 1:3–7 as a rhetorical omission of creation, not a cosmological denial. He describes the epilogue as "blunting the book's subversive edge" — privileging Qoheleth's autonomous voice over the canon's framing device — while criticising Longman for separating Qoheleth's theology from the book's, a mirror-image of the same move. His reading of 7:16 as prescribing moral "balance" between righteousness and wickedness misleads preachers; Fox (JPSTC) and Seow more accurately read it as warning against perfectionist scrupulosity. The epilogue imports Bonhoeffer's contested "living without God" as an interpretive key and characterises God as "the God of small things" (Arundhati Roy's ironic novel title) — framings that risk portraying God as passive and marginal, contrary to Qoheleth's own insistence that God judges, gives, and determines all (3:14; 5:2; 11:9). Brown also invokes Bildad to critique Job's lament, overlooking that God vindicates Job and condemns Bildad in Job 42:7; and he draws a positive parallel between Qoheleth's joy and the medium at Endor, whose divination the law explicitly forbids (Lev. 19:31). Useful homiletically, but best read alongside Seow, Fox, or Bartholomew.
For pastors and lay people
For pastors and lay peopl