Women's Bible Commentary (3rd ed.)
Women's Bible Commentary (3rd ed.)
Non-technical
Feminist

Women's Bible Commentary (3rd ed.)

by eds. Newsom, Carol A.; Ringe, Sharon H.; Lapsley, Jacqueline E.

2 Rank Score: 2.14 from 1 reviews, 1 featured collections, and 1 user libraries
Pages 704
Publisher Westminster John Knox
Published 7/28/2012
ISBN-13 9780664237073
The Women's Bible Commentary is a trusted, classic resource for biblical scholarship, written by some of the best feminist scholars in the field today. This twentieth anniversary edition features brand new or thoroughly revised essays to reflect newer thinking in feminist interpretation and hermeneutics. It comprises commentaries on every book of the Bible, including the apocryphal books; essays on the reception history of women in the Bible; and essays on feminist critical method. The contributors raise important questions and explore the implications of how women and other marginalized people are portrayed in biblical texts, looking specifically at gender roles, sexuality, political power, and family life, while challenging long-held assumptions. This commentary brings modern critical methods to bear on the history, sociology, anthropology, and literature of the relevant time periods to illuminate the context of these biblical portrayals and challenges readers to new understandings.



Collections

This book appears in the following featured collections.

Reviews

Add Your Review

DavidH DavidH June 20, 2026
Women’s Bible Commentary is a wide-ranging feminist anthology that performs a real service by recovering neglected women, exposing patriarchal assumptions and abusive uses of Scripture, and warning readers never to use biblical language to excuse coercion, domestic violence, or exclusion. Its central weakness, however, is methodological: women’s experience and a modern “liberating” ideal often become a canon within the canon by which difficult passages are retained, redefined, or rejected. Thus disputed claims of interpolation, pseudonymity, or patriarchal editorial manipulation are sometimes treated as though established fact; Galatians 3:28’s equal inheritance in Christ is made to erase every other relational distinction without argument; and apostolic instructions are judged before their literary and historical context is allowed to clarify them. The volume also too often confuses metaphor with literal referent: Hosea’s covenant-marriage imagery, Jeremiah’s personified-city language, and Revelation’s Bride, Babylon, woman, and 144,000 are corporate symbols, not literal women being abused, excluded from heaven, or replaced by purified males. Their gendered and violent rhetoric remains morally troubling and pastorally dangerous, but it does not by itself justify indictments of God as abusive, sexually violent, or committed to male supremacy. Similarly, Luke–Acts’ women, Lydia, Mary, and the Ethiopian eunuch are active participants in God’s mission, not merely victims of ideological colonisation. The commentary is therefore valuable as a provocative supplementary resource, but unreliable as a primary guide to authorial meaning, canonical coherence, and the character of God.