Lex Talionis in Early Judaism and the Exhortation of Jesus in Matthew 5:38-42
Stock No: WW041506
Lex Talionis in Early Judaism and the Exhortation of Jesus in Matthew 5:38-42  -     By: James Davis

Lex Talionis in Early Judaism and the Exhortation of Jesus in Matthew 5:38-42

Bloomsbury Academic / 2005 / Hardcover

In Stock
Stock No: WW041506

Buy Item Our Price$287.50
In Stock
Quantity:
Stock No: WW041506
Bloomsbury Academic / 2005 / Hardcover
Quantity:

Add To Cart

or checkout with

Add To Wishlist
Quantity:


Add To Cart

or checkout with

Wishlist

Product Close-up
This product is not available for expedited shipping.
* This product is available for shipment only to the USA.
Others Also Purchased (15)
Select this Item Product Title/Author Availability Price Quantity
$287.50
In Stock
Our Price$287.50
Add To Cart
$287.50
$325.00
In Stock
Our Price$325.00
Add To Cart
$325.00
$287.50
In Stock
Our Price$287.50
Add To Cart
$287.50
$332.50
In Stock
Our Price$332.50
Add To Cart
$332.50
$325.00
In Stock
Our Price$325.00
Add To Cart
$325.00

Product Description

In Matthew 5:38-42, Jesus overrides the Old Testament teaching of 'an eye for eye and a tooth for a tooth' - the Lex Talionis law - and commands his disciples to turn the other cheek. James Davis asks how Jesus' teaching in this instance relates to the Old Testament talionic commands, how it relates to New Testament era Judaism and what Jesus required from his disciples and the church. Based on the Old Testament texts such as Leviticus 24, Exodus 22 and Deuteronomy 19, a strong case can be made that the Lex Talionis law was understood to have a literal application there are several texts that text of Leviticus 24 provides the strongest case that a literal and judicial application. However, by the second century AD and later, Jewish rabbinic leadership was essentially unified that the OT did not require a literal talion, but that financial penalties could be substituted in court matters. Yet there is evidence from Philo, Rabbi Eliezer and Josephus that in the first century AD the application of literal talion in judicial matters was a major and viable Jewish viewpoint at the time of Jesus. Jesus instruction represents a different perspective from the OT lex talionis texts and also, possibly, from the Judaism of his time. Jesus commands the general principle of not retaliation against the evil person and intended this teaching to be concretely applied, as borne out in his own life.

Product Information

Title: Lex Talionis in Early Judaism and the Exhortation of Jesus in Matthew 5:38-42
By: James Davis
Format: Hardcover
Number of Pages: 224
Vendor: Bloomsbury Academic
Publication Date: 2005
Dimensions: 8.88 X 5.75 (inches)
Weight: 15 ounces
ISBN: 0567041506
ISBN-13: 9780567041500
Stock No: WW041506

Publisher's Description

In Matthew 5:38-42, Jesus overrides the Old Testament teaching of 'an eye for eye and a tooth for a tooth' - the Lex Talionis law - and commands his disciples to turn the other cheek. James Davis asks how Jesus' teaching in this instance relates to the Old Testament talionic commands, how it relates to New Testament era Judaism and what Jesus required from his disciples and the church.

Based on the Old Testament texts such as Leviticus 24, Exodus 22 and Deuteronomy 19, a strong case can be made that the Lex Talionis law was understood to have a literal application there are several texts that text of Leviticus 24 provides the strongest case that a literal and judicial application. However, by the second century AD and later, Jewish rabbinic leadership was essentially unified that the OT did not require a literal talion, but that financial penalties could be substituted in court matters. Yet there is evidence from Philo, Rabbi Eliezer and Josephus that in the first century AD the application of literal talion in judicial matters was a major and viable Jewish viewpoint at the time of Jesus.

Jesus instruction represents a different perspective from the OT lex talionis texts and also, possibly, from the Judaism of his time. Jesus commands the general principle of not retaliation against the evil person and intended this teaching to be concretely applied, as borne out in his own life.

JSNTS

Ask a Question

Author/Artist Review